Legal Opinion

Lowinger v. Broderick

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 22, 1995No. 94-2077PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, District Judge.

In this case Plaintiffs, Lazar and Audrey Lowinger, seek recovery under 42 United States Code Section 1983 and state tort law 1 from Defendants, Sergeant William T. Bro- derick (“Broderick”) and Commissioner Francis M. Roaehe, both of the Boston Police Department; former Boston Mayor Raymond Flynn; and the City of Boston for damages caused by Defendants’ allegedly false arrest of Lazar Lowinger. Defendant Broderick, who was sued in his individual and official capacities, moved for summary judgment asserting his entitlement to qualified immunity for any of the acts…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Ralph Rogers v. Michael FairCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Febus-Rodriguez v. Betancourt-LebronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wood v. MCC SuperintendantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Fernandez-Vargas v. PfizerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. John W. Billmyer, American Honda Motor Company, Inc., United States of America v. John W. Billmyer and Dennis Josleyn, Lyon & LyonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. Navedo v. MaloneyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  5. Demers Ex Rel. Demers v. Leominster School DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API