Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 20, 2018No. S18A0827PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELTON, Presiding Justice.

**281The procedural posture of this appeal is somewhat unique. However, as explained more fully below, the appeal essentially amounts to an effort by Michelle Hall, who was represented by counsel in her **282first appeal, to pursue a second direct appeal, which is not authorized by Georgia law and which we are without jurisdiction to consider on the merits. See Milliken v. Stewart, 276 Ga. 712, 713, 583 S.E.2d 30 (2003) ("[A] criminal defendant whose conviction has been reviewed by an appellate court on direct appeal ... is not entitled to a second direct appeal from…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Richards v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  2. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  3. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2025
  4. Martin Canty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API