Legal Opinion

Iauch v. de Socarras

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 17, 1898PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Heard on bill, the joint answer of the two defendants, the cross-bill of Pauline de Socarras, and the replication of the complainant thereto.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

The bill is filed by a judgment creditor of Pauline de Socarras, and its object is to set aside a settlement made by her in favor of her son, Rudolfo de Socarras, Jr., the other defendant, of certain real estate, a house and lot in Long Branch, in Monmouth county, and subject that real estate to the lien of the judgment.

The complainant by his bill alleges, and the defendants by their answer admit, that judgment was recovered by him in the supreme court of this state, on the 6th of February, 1896, for the sum of $2,986.68, against Mrs. de Socarras, based upon an indebtedness which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. GravesNew York Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coles v. OsbackNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. Ferrell v. EllingMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Moran v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  5. Bryant v. KlattDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API