Legal Opinion

United States v. Cobb

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 3, 1882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On Motion for New Trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, D. J.

This is an action to recover the duties on 619 bales of jute rejections imported by the defendants at New York in August, 1872. At the trial the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendants now move for a new trial on the ground that this direction should not have been given. .

Considered in the most favorable light for the defendants, the evidence proved the following facts:

For several years prior to August 1,1872, jute butts had been subject to a duty of six dollars a ton; and under the instructions of the secretary of the treasury jute rejections had been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. MEREDITH v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Wills v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Arthur v. UnkartSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Westray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Cherry Hill Textiles, Inc., and International Cargo and Surety Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Ataka America, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
  3. Vitelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. Joanna Western Mills Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. United States v. Grand Rapids & I. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API