Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1930No. Criminal No. 730PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

The defendant was convicted in the superior court of Maricopa county of a violation of the provisions of section 4780, Revised Code of 1928. The record in the superior court was duly brought to this court, but counsel have filed no briefs in support of the appeal. We have therefore examined the record for fundamental error only.

It appears therefrom that the information properly charges a public offense under section 4780, supra, that the verdict of the jury found the defendant guilty of the offense charged in the information, and that all proceedings were regular up to the time of sentence.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FelkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. In re BeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. State v. McKelveyArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Ex parte State, in re NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Dunbar v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. State v. Van MeterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. State v. BigelowArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Peterson v. FloodArizona Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API