Tonkel v. Riteman
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.
It is firmly established that where, without a new contract, a tenant continues to occupy the property which he has held under an annual lease, he becomes liable as tenant for another year at the same rate and under the same terms. Love v. Law, 57 Miss. 596; Usher v. Moss, 50 Miss. 208. It is the duty of a tenant when his period of tenancy has expired to surrender the premises to his' landlord or else to have procured a new contract, and, if he fails to do either, the landlord may treat him as a trespasser or as a tenant under the previous terms, according to the option of the landlord. In…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wolffe v. WolffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Usher v. MossMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
- Love v. LawMississippi Supreme Court · 1880
- Thomas Hinds Lodge No. 58 v. Presbyterian ChurchMississippi Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miss. State Dept. of Public Welfare v. HowieMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Mississippi State Highway Commission v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- Brown v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Donnelly Advertising Corp. v. FlaccomioCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Dungan v. PresleyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.