State v. Noble
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J.
The court of appeals reversed the perjury conviction of Debra Noble after concluding that her testimony during a John Doe proceeding should have been suppressed because during the proceeding she was questioned by a law enforcement officer who was not licensed to practice law. The court regarded the officer's conduct as a violation of the unauthorized practice of law statute and concluded that, although neither a constitutional violation nor a statutory violation requiring suppression occurred, suppression was still necessary as a sanction. We dis*211agree. Even…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. PopenhagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Unnamed Person No.1 v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. Gary Monroe ScullWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- State ex rel. Hipp v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. SteffesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.