Legal Opinion

State v. Noble

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2002No. 99-3271-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J.

The court of appeals reversed the perjury conviction of Debra Noble after concluding that her testimony during a John Doe proceeding should have been suppressed because during the proceeding she was questioned by a law enforcement officer who was not licensed to practice law. The court regarded the officer's conduct as a violation of the unauthorized practice of law statute and concluded that, although neither a constitutional violation nor a statutory violation requiring suppression occurred, suppression was still necessary as a sanction. We dis*211agree. Even…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. CummingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. PopenhagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State Ex Rel. Unnamed Person No.1 v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. Gary Monroe ScullWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State ex rel. Hipp v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. SteffesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API