Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 2, 1980No. CR 80-90PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of first degree escape in violation of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-2810 (Repl. 1977) and, as a habitual criminal, received a sentence of fifteen years’ imprisonment. Nine months previously, he was convicted of aggravated robbery. We affirmed. Wright v. State, 267 Ark. 264, 590 S.W. 2d 15 (1979).

Appellant first asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion for commitment to the state hospital for a mental examination based on his insanity plea. He cites Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-605 (Repl. 1977) as being mandatory that he be examined there.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Wade v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Houston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Toland v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. James C. Wright v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  3. Webber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Beard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API