Legal Opinion

Meyer Land Co. v. Pecor

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Brown county; Hon. J. H. McCoy, Judge. Action by the Meyer Land Company against A. Pecor. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFuller, J.

Specific performance of the following instrument was decreed in the court below, and the defendant appeals :

“Beceived of Meyer Land Co. the sum of fifty dollars for the south half 34-123-63 and N. E. \ of 3-122-63 for nine thousand dollars $6000 cash and the balance on time at 6 per pent 500 payment per year.
“July 5, 1902.

A. Pecor.”

*467The back of the instrument contains the following instrument: “Fifty to be given back if parties wont take it without the fifth of the. crop. ”

Appellant’s prompt reiusal to convey the premises above described was accompanied by an offer to return the $50 which was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  2. Williams v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  3. Schmeling v. KrieselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Horner v. WoodlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  5. Johnson v. PlotnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Skjoldal v. MyrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Rahm v. CummingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Phelan v. NearySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Chambers v. RoselandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Monroe v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API