Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Roseland

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Faulk County. Hon. Loring E. GaRRy, Judge. Action by C. B. Chambers against Martin Roseland. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.'

1Opinion of the CourtFuller, P. J.

The purpose of this action was to obtain judgment for the specific performance of the following written instrument: “$25.00. Faulkton, Jan. 15, 1902. Received of C. B. Chambers twenty-five dollars on purchase price of $400.00 cash for the N. W. of Sec. 30-117-71; M. Roseland to furnish warrantee deed & clear abstract & sale to be completed in 30 days or this contract is forfeited. C. B. Chambers to- receive $25 com. on the same. (Signed) Martin Roseland.” Taking the view that the foregoing is a mere option which was forfeited by the failure of plaintiff to pay, or offer .to pay, the balance…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meyer Land Co. v. PecorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. AMERICAN PRAIRIE CONSTRUCTION CO. v. HoichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Phelan v. NearySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Ernst v. DeisterArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hughes v. PayneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. American Prairie, etc. v. Tri-State FinancialCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API