Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Motorists Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 2001PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, J.:

¶ 1 Valinda Tyler appeals from the order of the trial court which sustained Appel-lee’s demurrer to her complaint and dismissed the action. The sole issue presented involves an interpretation of the word “month” within the context of Appellant’s automobile insurance policy. After careful review, we affirm.

¶ 2 The undisputed facts reveal that Appellant was involved in an automobile accident on March 24, 1997 and was injured. At the time of the accident, she was employed by the Commonwealth in the Department of Public Welfare and was earning an approximate gross daily wage of $125.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Riccio v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Gene & Harvey Builders, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Allstate Auto Leasing Co. v. CaldwellSuperior Court of Delaware · 1978
  5. Tenos v. State Farm InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Neuhard v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Whole Enchilada, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Burton v. Republic InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Ridgeway v. U.S. Life Credit Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API