Legal Opinion
Mungo v. Duncan
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 8, 2003No. 1:02-cv-05586PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, JUDGMENT & ORDER
WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge.
A hearing was held in this matter to determine whether petitioner is entitled to a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was present by telephone. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied for the reasons stated orally on the record. Like so many cases, this one leaves the impression that petitioner may well be innocent— as are in the order of one percent, or many thousands, of the millions of individuals in criminal custody in the United States. The limited power of this court does not permit it to release a prisoner on the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marcus Mungo v. George DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Jessamy v. LamannaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- McFadden v. GrahamDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019