Legal Opinion

James Lyons v. Ronald Powell

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 4, 1988No. 87-1177PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

James Lyons, who appears pro se, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his complaint for failure to state a cause of action, and from its denial of Lyons’s motion for appointment of counsel. Upon motion of appellant, we have consolidated those appeals with Lyons’s appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b).

The appellant filed an initial and an amended complaint, both of which were referred to a magistrate and dismissed for a failure to state a cause of action, as set forth in the magistrate’s report and recommendation…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Young v. KeohaneDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Scott v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. People v. BanksIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Genise Hart v. Michael Sheahan, Sheriff of Cook County, and Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. State v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API