Legal Opinion
In Re Banks
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 21, 1989No. 87-97PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GALLAGHER, Senior Judge.
This court’s Committee on Unauthorized Practice of Law (“petitioner” or “Committee”) filed a petition pursuant to D.C.App. R. 49(d) from an order to show cause why respondent, Simon Banks, should not be held in contempt for, and/or permanently enjoined from, violating D.C.App.R. 49(b) concerning the unauthorized practice of law. 1 However, the Committee later withdrew its request for contempt, fine, and imprisonment on April 13,1987. 2 Thus, the court has before it only the Committee’s remaining requests for equitable relief in the form of (1)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Binkley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Brookens v. Committee on Unauthorized Practice of LawDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Merrick v. American Security & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- People ex rel. Colorado Bar Ass'n v. ErbaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- People v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Banks v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Banks v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Tavella v. Edwards (In Re Edwards)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Bergman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.