Legal Opinion

Emerine v. Belpash

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1926No. 1761PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This action was instituted in the Lucas Common Pleas by Edna Emerine as the wife of Frank Emerine to recover $2675, alleged to have been lost in gambling and $500 for exemplary damages. The defendants iti the case are Walter Belpash, Thomas Worland, the C. E. S. Realty Co. and several others.

It was claimed that the defendants were keepers of a certain place in Toledo' used for gaming' and gambling purposes and that from Feb. 1, 1922 to Jan. 13, 1923 the said Frank Emreine expended and paid the sum of $2675 to four of the defendants.

It was further alleged that the real estate upon which the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McGill v. WorlandOhio Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oldham, Admrs. v. Winget, Gdn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Desper v. LeiterOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. City of Gary v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API