Legal Opinion

McGill v. Worland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1926No. 1678PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Lulu McGill brought an action against Thomas Worland and one Belpash in the Lucas Common Pleas on Aug. 26, 1925, to recover $4,682 and $500 exemplary damages by reason of money claimed to have been lost in gambling by her husband. It was alleged that Worland and Belpash operated a gambitos place from Aug. 1, 1924 to June 1, 1925, during which time her husband expended $4,-682 in gambling.

Demurrers were filed to McGill’s petition on the ground that it did not state a cause of action and that it was not filed within the time allowed by law. The demurrers were sustained and the petition was…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Emerine v. BelpashOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Solether v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API