Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Friedlander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by Isaac N. Spiegelberg and another, as executors, etc., from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York, entered in the office of the said surrogate on the 21st day of July, 1913, authorizing the issuance of an execution against the executors of the last will and testament of Albert Friedlander, deceased.

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, J.:

Albert Friedlander died on June 2, 1909, leaving a last will and testament, which was duly admitted to probate, and letters testamentary were thereupon issued, on June 15, 1909, to Marie Friedlander and Isaac N. Spiegelman, as executors thereof.

In or about September, 1909, these executors sued Herman Citron and Nathan Citron for rent alleged to be due upon a lease made to them by said Albert Friedlander. This action resulted in a judgment in favor of said Herman and Nathan Citron for §373.62.

The estate of said Alfred Friedlander is insolvent, but the executors have in their hands…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Columbian Insurance Co. v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Camp v. Receivers of the Niagara BankNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  3. In re the Estate of MahoneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1902
  4. In re the Estate of MahoneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Carnegie Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. In re the Accounting of BatyiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
  3. In re Bank of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API