Legal Opinion

Mosley v. Owens

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 11, 1991No. L88-1583; CA A63738PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is a medical malpractice action in which the jury-returned a substantial verdict in favor of plaintiff and his wife. Defendant appeals on the ground that, contrary to Oregon’s “locality rule,” ORS 677.095, 2 plaintiffs expert witness was not familiar with the customary medical practices of specialists in Roseburg or a similar community, and therefore was not competent to testify as a medical expert. Determining whether an individual is qualified to testify as an expert witness is a matter that falls within the discretion of the trial court. Myers v. Cessna Aircraft, 275 Or 501, 519, 553…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myers v. Cessna Aircraft CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Creasey v. HoganOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. CaulderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thierfelder v. WolfertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Sanderson v. MarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Jerden v. AmstutzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Jerden v. AmstutzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Sullivan v. Multnomah CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API