Mosley v. Owens
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This is a medical malpractice action in which the jury-returned a substantial verdict in favor of plaintiff and his wife. Defendant appeals on the ground that, contrary to Oregon’s “locality rule,” ORS 677.095, 2 plaintiffs expert witness was not familiar with the customary medical practices of specialists in Roseburg or a similar community, and therefore was not competent to testify as a medical expert. Determining whether an individual is qualified to testify as an expert witness is a matter that falls within the discretion of the trial court. Myers v. Cessna Aircraft, 275 Or 501, 519, 553…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Myers v. Cessna Aircraft CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Creasey v. HoganOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. CaulderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thierfelder v. WolfertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Sanderson v. MarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Jerden v. AmstutzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Jerden v. AmstutzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Sullivan v. Multnomah CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023