Legal Opinion
United States v. Arthur C. Kellogg
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 3, 1992No. 90-50522PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
Arthur C. Kellogg appeals his conviction and sentence for mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (1988), and aiding the preparation of false tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2) (1988). He claims: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction; (2) the court improperly conducted ex parte communications with the prosecutor; and (3) his right of allocution was violated. With respect to his first claim, Kellogg specifically argues he cannot be convicted of mail fraud for sending false tax returns because the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Curtis J. Bernhardt, Michael F. McCarthy Harold T. Okahara, Jr., and Carl J. BernhardtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. AldenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Leo Orlando MunizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Jermaine Cortez CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Erik BowkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. MackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.