Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 1972Published

1DissentHennessey, J.

(dissenting, with whom Tauro, C.J., joins) I dissent from the majority opinion. In my view the statute is unconstitutional because the plaintiffs are being deprived of the equal protection of the laws. The statute applies to motor vehicle fuel sellers only and prohibits them from using the contests in connection with the sale of any products including those products sold by competitors who are not under a similar prohibition. The statute, with immaterial language deleted, is clear and unambiguous, viz.: “No dealer or seller of motor vehicle fuel . . . [shall engage in or operate promotional…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API