Legal Opinion

Richard W. Burge v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 25, 1965No. 18801_1PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge:

Following a trial to a jury, appellant was convicted on one count of a two count indictment charging violations of 21 U.S.C. § 174.1

*410The count upon which appellant was convicted (Count 2) in substance charged that on or about the 23rd day of April, 1959, at Fairbanks, Alaska, the appellant did knowingly conceal and facilitate transportation of a narcotic drug, to wit: heroin.

Count 1, on which the jury was unable to agree, in substance charged that on or about the 23rd day of April, 1959, at Fairbanks, Alaska, appellant knowingly received, sold and facilitated the sale of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. People v. ParhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Melvin Corngold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  4. Chester Nelson v. People of the State of California, Robert A. Heinze, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. William L. Maxwell v. Dan D. Stephens, Superintendent of Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API