Legal Opinion

Worley v. Worley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 12, 1980No. 78-831 to 78-833PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These three cases concern the intestate distribution of the estate of one Mrs. Oscar (Pinkie) Worley. They were consolidated for purposes of trial and are in the form of a petition for sale for division, a suit for accounting and a claim against Mrs. Worley's estate. In passing upon these claims, the trial judge granted the sale for division and the claim against the estate, specifically denying the request for an accounting. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I

In order to understand the nature of the present suits, it is necessary to focus…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ray v. Midfield Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Hall v. McKellerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Chaney's Heirs v. Chaney's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  5. Hyde v. StarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Charles Townsend Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Houston v. McClureSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Hutchins v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. BROADMOOR RLTY., INC. v. First Nationwide BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Brown v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API