Legal Opinion
Nichols v. Rysavy
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided May 10, 1985No. Civ. 83-5002, 83-5033 and 83-5055PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOGUE, Chief Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
These three cases were consolidated pursuant to F.R.C.P. 42(a) for the purpose of determining motions to dismiss filed in each of the three forced fee patent cases. 1
These three cases are actions to recover title and possession of former allotments on the Rosebud and Pine Ridge Indian Reservations from which the Plaintiffs claim to have been unlawfully denied and excluded and of which they claim to be entitled by virtue of acts of Congress. Plaintiffs further sue for injunctive declaratory relief against the federal Defendants (United States of America,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Matter of HeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Wright-Blodgett Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Larkin v. PaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Nichols v. RysavyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Beres v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Boller v. Key Bank of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Brown v. Northern Hills Regional Railroad AuthoritySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.