Legal Opinion
Lee v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1987No. 86-3651PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRIS, Circuit Judge:
Lee, Eklund, and Carr assert a variety of claims against the United States and two Alaska Native corporations. All of their claims are based on the contention that in 1979 the Secretary of Interior conveyed lands that rightfully belonged to them to the Native corporations. On a motion for summary judgment, the district court dismissed their claims against the United States, and all but one of their claims against the Native corporations, for lack of jurisdiction. It dismissed their remaining claim against the Native corporations for failure to state a claim. We affirm.
FAC…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blanton v. AnzaloneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Robert F. Burns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- City of Las Vegas v. Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Keystone Insurance Company v. Houghton, Joseph, Houghton, Donna Livoy, Cassidy, John, Cassidy, Kathleen, Livoy, FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Jose De La JaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Sierra Club v. PenfoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Shamrock Technologies, Inc. v. Medical Sterilization, Inc., and Robert S. LuniewskiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Robinson v. Volkswagenwerk AGCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.