Legal Opinion

Dobbs v. First Alexander Hamilton Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined that the life insurance policy lapsed, at the latest, one year after the default in the payment of the premium (see, Insurance Law § 3211 [a] [1]; Pinkof v Mutual Life Ins. Co., 49 AD2d 452, 455-456, affd 40 NY2d 1003; Margulis v Penn Assn., 123 Misc 2d 216, 218). The court erred, however, in granting judgment to defendant dismissing the complaint rather than declaring the rights of the parties (see, Pless v Town of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pless v. Town of RoyaltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Pless v. Town of RoyaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Pinkof v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Pinkof v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Margulis v. William Penn Ass'nCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weiss v. Security Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Maharan v. Berkshire Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2000
  3. Brettler v. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API