Legal Opinion
Margulis v. William Penn Ass'n
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided February 22, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
William D. Friedmann, J.
RELEVANT FACTS
Plaintiff was insured, along with her husband, under a major medical policy, issued by defendant insurance company. By a letter dated September 28,1981, defendant was notified that her husband had reached the age of 65 years, the maximum covered age under the policy and that she desired to continue the policy in her own name. She also enclosed her quarterly premium for the last three months of 1981.
Defendant, in response on October 5, 1981, notified plaintiff, by letter, of the termination date of her husband’s policy (last day of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pinkof v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In Re the Accounting of SchrauthNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Pinkof v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Lothrop v. Allstate Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- In re the Accounting of SchrauthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dobbs v. First Alexander Hamilton Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Brettler v. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022