Marriage of B. S. H. v. J. J. H.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1DissentManford, Judge
I must dissent.
The majority opinion disposes of this appeal by applying a legal presumption and concluding that the evidence was not sufficient to overcome the presumption. I disagree with the conclusion reached regarding *459the evidence, and believe the time has arrived for our courts to speak directly to the role of blood group tests in questioned paternity cases and the relationship of those tests to the legal presumption of legitimacy.
While this appeal presents the question of fitness for custody and charges error in the granting of custody to respondent, this dissent addresses only the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. MeachamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Cramer v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Malvasi v. MalvasiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.