Legal Opinion
Bowen v. Crabtree
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 1, 1998No. CIV. 98-126-HAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HAGGERTY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The petitioner, Paul N. Bowen (“Bowen”), is an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) at Sheridan, Oregon. The respondent, Joseph H. Crabtree, is the Warden of FCI at Sheridan, Oregon, and is inmate Bowen’s custodian and the proper respondent in this action. Fed.R.Civ.P. 81(a)(2); Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir.1992).
Bowen has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Bowen’s petition argues that his statutory and due process rights are being violated by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mark Brittingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Cort v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Seldovia Native Association, Inc. v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Delancy v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paul N. Bowen v. Robert A. Hood, 1 Warden, Fci, SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Gavis v. CrabtreeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1998
- Nelson v. CrabtreeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1999
- Paul N. Bowen v. Robert A. Hood, 1 Warden, Fci, SheridanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000