Legal Opinion

Paul N. Bowen v. Robert A. Hood, 1 Warden, Fci, Sheridan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 4, 2000No. 98-36190, 99-35035, 98-36191, 99-35041, 98-36223, 98-36224, 98-36273, 98-36274, 98-36277, 98-36279, 99-35040, 99-35080, 99-35063, 99-35090, 99-35081, 99-35082, 99-35174, 99-35175, 99-35176, 99-35177, 99-36280, 99-36281, 99-35157, 99-35232, 99-35598, 99-35627, 99-35629, 99-35631, 99-35636, 99-35637, 99-35659, 99-35672, 99-35415, 99-35416, 99-35417, 99-35418, 99-35419, 99-35420, 99-35421, 99-35422, 99-35424, 99-35425, 99-35430, 99-35431, 99-35432, 99-35433Published

1Opinion of the Court

202 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir. 2000)

PAUL N. BOWEN, Petitioner-Appellee,

v.

ROBERT A. HOOD,1 Warden, FCI, Sheridan, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 98-36190

PAUL N. BOWEN, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

ROBERT A. HOOD,1 Warden, FCI, Sheridan, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 99-35035

DONALD SCOTT, Petitioner-Appellee,

v.

ROBERT A. HOOD,1 Warden, FCI, Sheridan, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 98-36191

DONALD SCOTT, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

ROBERT A. HOOD,1 Warden, FCI, Sheridan, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 99-35041

LAMAR TOLLIVAR, Petitioner-Appellee,

v.

ROBERT A. HOOD,1 Warden, FCI, Sheridan, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 98-36223

LAMAR TOLLIVAR,…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Fernandez; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Thomas.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API