Slaughter v. Barnett
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
— By agreement of the parties and consent of the court the two above styled cases are considered together. One is a chancery cause and the other is a common law action, as the titles of the two cases indicate, although the parties are different, there being more persons constituting the parties in the chancery cause than constituted the parties in the common law action.
In each case Barrett was the complaining party. He began an action at law in the Circuit Court for Orange County against C. M. Slaughter and on the 6th day of June, 1932, obtained a judgment against Slaughter in the sum of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Smoot's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Daniels v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Commissioners of Taxing Dist. of Brownsville v. LoagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Croker v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Hospital Mortg. Group v. First Prudential Dev.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Mori v. MATSUSHITA ELEC. CORP., ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Sickler v. Indian River Abstract & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Pappas v. . CristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.