Legal Opinion

Shannahan v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 8, 1999No. 96CV1484-J RBBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JONES, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on motion for summary judgment by Defendant United States of America (“Government”). The Court has received and considered the Government’s motion, Plaintiffs’ opposition, and the Government’s reply. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1, the Court found the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument, notified the parties, and took the matter under submission. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Government’s motion for summary judgment.

This case involves a dispute…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Watson v. ChessmanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
  2. United States v. GonzalesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. United States v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API