Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Reddekopp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 1995No. 92-14452; CA A85411Published

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that claimant is entitled to a hearing on his claim for aggravation of a compensable injury. Because we agree with SAIF that the Board lacked jurisdiction to consider the claim, we vacate the Board’s order and reinstate the referee’s order. This case has a complex procedural history. In August 1983, claimant suffered a compensable back injury. The claim was ultimately closed by a 1987 determination order that awarded 35 percent permanent partial disability. Claimant sought a hearing and received an award of permanent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Barney v. DolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Dolph v. BarneyOregon Supreme Court · 1874
  4. SAIF Corp. v. RolesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Miltenberger v. Howard's PlumbingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API