Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Union Bridge Electric Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 5, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Carroll County (Moss, J.). Action by the Maryland Casualty Company, for its own use, and for the use of Iva N. Harbaugh ,and others, against the Union Bridg’e Electric Manufacturing Company. From certain orders in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.
This appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to the narr., filed by the insurer for its own use, and for the use of the dependents of a deceased employee, against an alleged tort feasor under section 58 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and from the refusal of the trial court to permit certain amendments to the narr.
The narr. was as follows:
“The plaintiff, Maryland Casualty Company, a body corporate, for its own use and to the use of Iva R. Arbaugh, Marion W. Arbaugh, Mabel L. Arbaugh, Benton A. Arbaugh, Ralph C. Arbaugh, and Charles G. Arbaugh, by Guy W. Steele, its attorney, sues…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilcher v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
- Freydendall v. BaldwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Harpold v. DoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by9 opinions
- Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc. v. Travelers Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Erie Insurance Co. v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- State v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Strong v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- The MaineDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.