Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Gerold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNally, J.

Defendant Roseann Gerold appeals from so much of a judgment, after a jury trial, which adjudged that plaintiffs recover against her. By stipulation all parties agreed in the event of a finding of liability that the plaintiff Vicki Abrams would have a judgment against Roseann Gerold, the Hertz Corporation, Spiro-Wallach Company, Inc. and William Frost in the sum of $36,250 and that plaintiff Joan Gerold would recover against the same defendants the same sum, to wit, $36,250.

The judgment so far as appealed from should be reversed on the law and the facts and vacated as it relates to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. People v. . KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Weigand v. . United Traction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. People v. SingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Moore v. LeventhalNew York Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Farrell v. InzeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Dees v. MTA N.Y. City Tr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  3. Druziak v. MahlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API