Legal Opinion

School Dist. No. 4 v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 19, 1929No. 18387PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Herein is presented an appeal from a judgment -below in favor of plaintiff below, plaintiff in error, independent schoo-l district No-. 4, Marshall county, Okla., and against defendant below, A. F. Stanley, county treasurer of Marshall county, Okla., and the board of county commissioners, of Marshall county, Okla.

TJie facts are agreed upon.:

“Agreed Statement of Facts. School District No. 4, v. County Treasurer.
“1. It is agreed that school district No. 4 became an independent district sometime in July, 1021.

‘■2. That after the board was organized, J. T. Crane was elected treasurer.

“3. That on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Newell v. HadleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. State v. FosterWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Stanard v. Sampson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. National Surety Co. v. State Ex Rel. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. National Surety Co. v. State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fourth National Bank of Tulsa v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Stanley v. School Dist. No. 4.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API