Clark v. Union Pac. R. Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GIVENS, Justice.
Respondent, ostensibly employed by appellant as a brakeman, working on a switching crew in the yards at Idaho Falls, attempted — in line of duty — to board a moving oil car. He claimed the grabiron and sill step were loose on one side, thereby giving way and tending to let him slip in under the moving car. To avoid such injury, he threw himself backward and fell from the car, striking his head on a rail of the adjoining track, rendering him momentarily unconscious, and causing ensuing alleged permanent injuries in that the accident either caused, or changed, petit mal into…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. BorumSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mitchell v. AtwoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Newkirk v. Los Angeles Junction Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Abbs v. RedmondIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Martin Company v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Air Mod Corporation v. NewtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Loomis v. ChurchIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Still v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Terry v. TerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.