Pantaze v. Fox-Head Spring Beverage Co.

On Motion of D'efendant in Error for a Rehearing.

In the motion attention is called to the fact that the act of 1923 (Gen. Laws 38th Leg. p. 40) providing that a term of the county court of Dallas county at law which rendered the judgment in question here should begin on the first Monday of October, though not carried into the Revised Statutes of 1925, was continued in force by the provision in article 1970 of said Statutes. And in said, motion attention is also called to the fact that in 1928, when said judgment was rendered, the first Monday in October was the first day of that month. It is…