Hesse v. City of Watertown
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MISER, C.
This action is brought under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, being chapter 214, Laws 1925. Omitting all findings not essential to the decision of the questions here raised, the facts as found by -the trial court are as follows: Plaintiff and appellant has, for many years, been a resident freeholder of the defendant and respondent city of Watertown and a patron of its municipal light plant. The other defendants and respondents are the mayor, auditor, treasurer, and members of the council of the city. For more than five years, Watertown has owned and operated its own electric…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mayor of Baltimore v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Newell v. People Ex Rel. PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Winston v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Joliet v. AlexanderIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Garrett v. SwantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Public Institutional Building Authority v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Campbell, Mo. v. Arkansas-Missouri Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Fjeldsted v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.