Legal Opinion

State v. Quality Egg Farm, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1981No. 80-938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The issues in this case are the definition in the state of Wisconsin of a public nuisance and whether the evidence in this case sustained the trial court’s conclusion of a public nuisance which allowed the state of Wisconsin as a proper party to bring the complaint.

The court of appeals reversed and found as a matter of law that there was no public nuisance established and, therefore, the attorney general’s office was not empowered to seek the abatement of defendant’s (Quality Egg Farm, Inc.) operation. We reverse the court of appeals and remand to the trial court for findings consistent with…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Chart Ex Rel. Sommer v. General Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hunter v. McDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Jost v. Dairyland Power CooperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Schiro v. Oriental Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Physicians Plus Insurance v. Midwest Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Physicians Plus Insurance v. Midwest Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. City of Milwaukee v. NL Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  4. Bauder v. Delavan-Darien School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  5. City of South Milwaukee v. KesterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API