Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State ex rel. Richmond American Homes of West Virginia, Inc. v. Sanders

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2010No. 35440Published

1ConcurrenceDavis, Chief Justice

The majority opinion has remanded this ease to give the trial judge an opportunity to reconsider its sanction ruling under the factors outlined in the opinion. The test adopted by the majority opinion sets out an appropriate standard for trial judges to use when considering the imposition of sanctions on a party under the trial court’s inherent authority. Therefore, I concur in the judgment of the majority opinion. I write separately, however, to underscore that the egregious conduct in this ease warranted the sanction imposed by the trial judge and thus, no remand is necessitated.

I. A…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Marks v. StrubleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
  2. Sharrow v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. McMullen v. KutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Bowens v. Atlantic Maintenance Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  5. State Ex Rel. Great American Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API