Moriarty v. Weiss
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
O’NIELL, Chief Justice.
The plaintiffs are suing to collect nine promissory notes for $3,500 each, plus the stipulated interest and attorney’s fee. The notes were signed and issued by one Samuel J. Dessalles, but the obligation to pay the notes was assumed afterwards by Sol Weiss, who is the defendant in this suit. He pleaded in defense of the suit, that his assuming of the obligation was for the protection of Dessalles only, and not for the benefit of any holder or owner of the notes; that he assumed only a contingent or conditional obligation, dependent upon the condition that Dessalles…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Allen & Currey Mfg. Co. v. Shreveport Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- Isaacs v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Vinet v. BresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
- Peoples' Homestead Ass'n v. GarlandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Brandon v. HughesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- Rogillio v. CazedessusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- Texas Co. v. State Mineral BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Texaco, Inc. v. Vermilion Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Stack v. De Soto Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.