Legal Opinion

Brannan v. Paty

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 6,543PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment in the Fourth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Morrison, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Boss, J.:

This case presents an appeal from a judgment dismissing the action, and the determination of the appeal depends on the question whether the answer to the amended complaint contains a counterclaim. On both sides, the pleadings contain a mass of inappropriate matter—matter of evidence and matter which is neither of evidence nor of pleading. The main purpose of the action, however, seems to have been to have the plaintiff’s alleged title to certain real property quieted. If the averments of the amended complaint were true, the appropriate relief would have been a decree to that effect,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. CuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Stowell v. EldredWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Doyle v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cornblith v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Babcock v. MaxwellMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Carpenter v. HewelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Regan v. JonesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API