Cornblith v. Valentine
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action for specific performance of an agreement to exchange real property. It appears that on October 4, 1926, plaintiff was the owner of an equity in certain improved real property in Hermosa Beach, and the defendants were the owners of an equity in certain improved real property elsewhere in Los Angeles County. On that date, the parties, by an agreement in writing, agreed to exchange their respective equities, each party to assume certain designated encumbrances. The amended complaint alleges full compliance with this agreement on the part of plaintiff, and alleges the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Wilson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Doyle v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- McDougald v. Argonaut Land & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Brannan v. PatyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by12 opinions
- Case v. Kadota Fig Ass'n of ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Case v. Kadota Fig Assn.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Keenan v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Schrader v. NevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Luse v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.