Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Turbine Design, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided February 7, 2000No. 99-1152PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION
BREEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court by consent of the parties is the motion of defendants, Turbine Design, Inc. and Douglas K. Karlsen, to dismiss plaintiffs complaint, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of -Civil Procedure, for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. The court has carefully considered the motion and response submitted by the parties, as well as the applicable law. For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schultz v. AryDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
- American Eyewear, Inc. v. Peeper's Sunglasses and Accessories, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2000
- Miller v. AsensioDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2000
- Sunlight Saunas, Inc. v. Sundance Sauna, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- First Tennessee National Corp. v. Horizon National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.