Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lemaire, Faunce & Katznelson v. Cox

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1985No. B006449PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

The principal issue on this appeal is whether a partial adjudication of issues pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c constitutes a “trial” under Code of Civil Procedure section 583, subdivision (b).

Lemaire, Faunce & Katznelson, (Lemaire) respondent to this appeal, filed a complaint on September 26, 1978, against Robert Cox, appellant, for failure to pay attorneys fees. Cox cross-complained against Lemaire alleging, among other things, negligence on behalf of Lemaire in the handling of his case. The cross-complaint was filed on September 26, 1978. 1 The complaint…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Superior Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. King v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Cannon v. City of NovatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Singelyn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Monroe v. Columbia Sunrise Hospital & Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re Marriage of MacFarlane & LangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. Eller Outdoor AdvertisingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Cal-Vada Aircraft, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. In Re Marriage of DunmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API