Legal Opinion

State v. Accor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 13, 1970No. 26PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, C.J.

Decision of the questions raised by defendants’ assignments of error and discussed in their brief must be deferred until the patent error appearing on the face of the official minutes has been corrected by appropriate proceedings.

In respect of the verdicts as recorded in the official minutes, the portions designated (a), (b) and (c) are in irreconcilable conflict. Obviously, these minute entries were made within the framework of *570a form which, if used as intended, contemplated that in any case where a verdict of guilty was returned the portions designated (a) and (b) would be stricken.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. StubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. OldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. FountainCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API