Legal Opinion

Dilday v. David

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 21, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellees, doing business as the Aurora Southwestern Sales Company, brought suit against ap.pellant to recover the balance alleged to be due upon a contract for the sale of a pump. Appellant answered and admitted the balance sued for was due on the contract, but, by way of counterclaim, alleged there had been a breach of the guaranty under which the pump had 'been sold, that it would furnish or supply 1,200 gallons of water per minute to a rice crop which the pump was purchased to irrigate.

The contract of sale was in writing, and the guaranty contained in it reads as follows: “The above pump…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tiegs v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  2. Lamkins v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Gregory v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Farm Bureau Lumber Corporation v. McMillanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  5. Western Indiana Gravel Co. v. OppIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API