Legal Opinion

Farm Bureau Lumber Corporation v. McMillan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 30, 1947No. 4-8233PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

An instruction, concerning the measure of damages for the destruction of a hay crop, is claimed to be erroneous.

The landowner, McMillan (appellee), brought action against the Farm Bureau Lumber Corporation (appellant) for damages for the alleged destruction of a “20-acre meadow . . . which could have been harvested at a profit of $20 per ton.” Damages for $400 were claimed. The jury verdict was for $300. McMillan claimed that his meadow had been planted to lespedeza in 1945, and that the lespedeza reseeded itself in 1946, and would have produced a crop of hay, except…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Atlanta & Birmingham A. L. Ry. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Byrne v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Railway Co. v. YarboroughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  4. Railway Co. v. LymanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  5. Risse v. CollinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Rogers v. StillmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  3. Farm Credit Midsouth, PCA v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Moore v. City of BlythevilleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Reeder Flying Service v. CromptonWyoming Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API