Legal Opinion

Hodgen v. Byrne

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 29, 1940No. 14,592PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakke

Plaintiffs in error by petition sought a writ of habeas corpus against defendant in error, respondent below, to compel the production in court of a minor child and for a determination of its proper custody. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Petitioners seek reversal here.

Plaintiff in error John T. Byrne is the divorced husband of defendant in error. The child, the subject of this litigation, was the issue of the marriage of the parties in Michigan, which was the matrimonial domicile. March 18, 1936, a final decree of divorce in an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Wagner v. TorrenceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  2. Averch v. AverchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  3. In re StockmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Kruse v. KruseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  5. In Re LeuMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McMillin v. McMillinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  2. State Ex Rel. Huhn v. HuhnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Hunter v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Evans v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  5. Kraudel v. BennerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API