Legal Opinion
Clark v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 22, 2000No. 97-CM-1310PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant was convicted of threats to do bodily harm, D.C.Code § 22-507 (1996), based on statements he made to a police officer. He argues on appeal that the statements should have been suppressed because they were made during the course of an unlawful arrest. Alternatively, he contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction. We affirm.
I. Facts
The complainant, Officer Gwendolyn Mapp, was the sole witness in the trial court. According to her testimony, 1 Officer Mapp was patrolling the grounds of a public housing complex on March 21, 1997, when…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Carl BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Carl Sprinkle, A/K/A Carl SprinklerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Andrew SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lee Carrell v. United States (Revised Version)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. BrocuglioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- In re S.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Baker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.